Members of a Parliamentary panel have suggested that the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET-UG) be conducted multiple times a year, similar to several international standardized examinations, to reduce academic pressure on students and improve flexibility in the medical admissions process.

The recommendation comes amid ongoing discussions on examination reforms following concerns over the conduct of recent entrance examinations. At present, NEET-UG, India’s largest medical entrance test, is held once annually in a single session, determining admission to MBBS, BDS, AYUSH, and other undergraduate medical programmes across the country.

Panel members reportedly argued that a single high-stakes examination places immense pressure on students, as one poor performance can significantly impact their chances of securing admission. Conducting the examination multiple times a year could provide candidates with additional opportunities to improve their scores and reduce dependence on a single test day.

The proposal has gained attention following controversies surrounding this year’s NEET-UG examination. The test conducted on May 3 was later cancelled amid allegations of a question paper leak, triggering concerns about examination security, transparency, and fairness.

NEET-UG is among the most competitive entrance examinations in India, with over 20 lakh candidates appearing annually for a limited number of medical seats. The examination serves as the primary gateway to undergraduate medical education and plays a crucial role in shaping the future careers of aspiring doctors.

Education experts have long debated the benefits of multiple examination cycles, noting that such systems can help reduce anxiety, minimize the impact of unforeseen circumstances, and provide a more student-friendly assessment framework. Similar models are already used in several national and international standardized testing systems.

Supporters of the proposal believe that multiple testing windows could improve accessibility while enhancing the resilience of the examination process. However, they also note that implementation would require robust infrastructure, enhanced security measures, and careful coordination by examination authorities.

The recommendation reflects broader efforts to strengthen examination systems and improve the student experience in India’s highly competitive education environment. While no formal decision has been announced, the suggestion is expected to contribute to ongoing discussions on future reforms in medical entrance examinations.

If adopted, the move could represent one of the most significant changes to India’s medical admission process in recent years.